Find the access that offboarding missed.
AccessSweep turns redacted exits, SaaS rosters, app-owner lists, and asset exports into a weekly gap audit for non-SCIM apps, contractor access, unused licenses, and missing laptops.
Validation page only. Early users get a manual offboarding-gap audit before software is built.
offboarding gap audit
7 exits · 43 apps · 11 gaps
Contractor: Maya R.
OAuth grant still active in design tool · no removal screenshot
Former AE: Lucas P.
CRM disabled, billing portal owner not verified
Laptop C02X
Return label sent 12 days ago · manager has no status
Audit-ready next step
“Ask Finance owner to confirm removal by Tuesday. Save screenshot and renewal-seat delta to the offboarding packet.”
Narrow customer
IT admins and IT ops managers at 100-500 employee companies with Google Workspace or Microsoft 365 plus many non-SSO SaaS tools.
Paid problem
Missed access removals, orphaned OAuth grants, unused licenses, and unreturned laptops create audit exposure, security risk, and recurring manual work.
Landing test
Join to test whether a redacted CSV-and-screenshot audit beats buying another expensive SaaS-management platform.
Day-in-the-life pain
The directory account is disabled. The real offboarding is not done.
HR sends an exit. The AD account is disabled. Then the messy list begins: the design app without SCIM, the contractor OAuth grant, the finance portal owned by a department lead, the renewal spreadsheet, and the laptop that may or may not be in transit.
Input
Upload redacted HR exits, Google/Microsoft users, app-owner roster, SaaS exports, asset list, and a few offboarding ticket samples.
Checks
AccessSweep compares departed people against non-SSO apps, OAuth grants, app owners, license renewals, assets, and missing removal evidence.
Output
A prioritized gap board: revoke here, verify there, chase this laptop, remove inactive seats, and save audit-ready proof.
What breaks today
Spreadsheets miss risk. Enterprise suites can become expensive spreadsheets.
The research points to a narrow wedge: not a full identity-governance rollout, not a giant SaaS-management replacement, and not a blank checklist. The buyer needs an evidence trail for the apps and assets that fall between HR, IT, Finance, and department owners.
Non-SCIM app queue
Track apps that are not covered by your identity provider and assign each removal check to the correct business owner.
Exit-to-asset join
Connect departed employees to assigned laptops, chargers, badges, and return status so asset chasing is visible before the exit goes cold.
Audit evidence packet
Keep screenshots, ticket links, manager confirmations, and removal dates in one exportable trail for SOC 2 and client-security reviews.
License leak scan
Flag inactive users that still appear in renewal lists or SaaS exports before you pay for another unused seat.
Concierge-safe start
Validate with redacted CSVs and screenshots first. No production OAuth connection is required for the initial audit.
Community proof
Public IT operators describe the same control gap.
These are public signals, not proof of demand. The waitlist tests whether IT admins will share redacted exports for a manual offboarding-gap audit before software is built.
Reddit r/sysadmin · non-integrated apps
An IT operator can disable AD accounts with a script, but still needs a simple way to track SaaS apps that are not integrated with AD, SCIM, or provisioning so users are removed manually.
Reddit r/sysadmin · SaaS sprawl without a $20k tool
A vendor-stack owner describes spreadsheets failing at 50+ tools, while a large SaaS-management platform still requires manual contract and invoice data entry.
Reddit r/sysadmin · asset retrieval workflow
An IT team manually chases laptops after employees leave, logs returns in a spreadsheet, then wipes, reassigns, or stores devices once they finally arrive.
GitHub Issues · contractor OAuth revocation
A public problem issue frames the missing control as systematically revoking contractor OAuth access after offboarding, reinforcing the audit/security gap.
Objections
Why not just use Okta, a checklist, or a SaaS-management suite?
We already disable Google or AD
Good. AccessSweep starts where the directory stops: non-SCIM apps, app-owner proof, OAuth grants, and physical assets.
We have a spreadsheet
The first audit can import it, then flag stale owners, missing evidence, departed users, and unclosed asset loops.
Enterprise tools are too much
The validation offer is deliberately lightweight: redacted exports in, prioritized audit packet out.
Security data is sensitive
Early users can redact names and domains. The goal is to validate the workflow before asking for production integrations.
Early waitlist offer
Send one redacted exit. Get the gaps back.
Early users get a manual offboarding-gap audit, the exact control checklist used, and a short call to decide whether the weekly AccessSweep board is worth building.